Galveston County voters approved two infrastructure bonds totaling $110 million for road and flood control projects while rejecting a third $75.8 million bond proposal to expand the county’s juvenile detention center.
On Saturday, voters approved two significant infrastructure propositions, amounting to over $110 million, aimed at enhancing transportation and drainage systems. In contrast, a contentious $75.8 million bond proposal to expand the county’s juvenile detention center was rejected.
Proposition A has successfully garnered 55% support, paving the way for funding 12 transportation projects throughout the county, amounting to over $74 million. A notable investment of $25 million has been allocated for essential repairs to the San Luis Pass Bridge, a vital link between Galveston Island and San Luis Island.
Galveston County Judge Mark Henry stated, “We worked for more than a year with the municipalities to identify key projects that would positively impact each community.” The San Luis Pass Bridge has been recognized as a significant priority in ongoing infrastructure assessments.
Proposition C has successfully garnered the support of nearly 59% of voters, securing $36 million for the implementation of six drainage and flood control projects. The Bayshore drainage improvement project is set to receive a significant allocation of $21.55 million, marking it as the largest share of funding in the upcoming budget. Judge Henry stated that these initiatives are designed to assist communities vulnerable to flooding.
Henry explained that Galveston County, located along the coast, is characterized by its relatively flat terrain. Conveying water to Galveston Bay presents a significant challenge, underscoring the critical importance of effective drainage planning.
Proposition B, which proposed a $55 million overhaul of the juvenile detention center, was rejected by voters, with more than 53% casting their ballots against the measure. A proposed project aims to enhance a center established in 1996 by adding 48 beds, classrooms, a kitchen, and various other facilities.
Judge Henry addressed concerns among voters in a recent statement, linking the outcome to widespread public apprehension regarding excessive spending. “Facilities projects frequently carry a negative perception... Our proposal did not include anything extravagant.”
Opponents of the bond, such as the Texas Jail Project, expressed satisfaction with its defeat, calling on the county to prioritize investment in preventive community services.
“The allocation of $55 million could be redirected towards crisis stabilization, mental health care, and housing initiatives, which have consistently demonstrated more effective outcomes than incarceration,” stated a representative from the nonprofit organization.
Comprehensive project details for each proposition can be accessed on the Galveston County website.
