After 40 years of service, the iconic Stewart Beach Pavilion in Galveston is being demolished, marking a new chapter for the popular beach park.
In the last week of November, demolition workers started taking apart the Stewart Beach Pavilion, which was something that Galveston officials had been waiting for a long time. The building was constructed in 1984, but it has been severely damaged by corrosion, erosion, and rising upkeep costs. In March, the city council agreed to pay $158,814 to have it taken down.
The Galveston Parks Board, which is in charge of the pavilion, said that fixing up the old building was getting more and more expensive, costing more than $70,000 a year.
The pavilion's future is still unknown, but talks about redeveloping Stewart Beach Park should move in a more clear direction in the next few days. The parks board hired a company in 2018 to make drawings of a possible replacement, but there have been no official announcements of plans yet.
The Stewart Beach social media team told people who live or visit the beach to "stay tuned" for more information about how the site will be changed. For now, city officials are hopeful that taking down the pavilion will lead to real action in planning the next part of this popular beach destination.
Auction Section will hold a major online Gulf Coast real estate auction on November 5th, 2025, featuring residential, waterfront, and investment properties in Bolivar Peninsula, Galveston Island, Tiki Island, and Harbor Walk. Buyers and sellers can register now for this unique opportunity to participate in one of the region’s largest coastal property auctions.
A suspect has been arrested in connection with the theft of a tractor and trailer in Alvin, Texas. The stolen items were recovered in Sugar Land following an investigation by the Gulf Coast Auto Crimes Task Force.
Researchers from Rice University’s SSPEED Center unveiled a $7 billion plan to build a 10,000-acre barrier island in Galveston Bay to guard Houston’s petrochemical corridor against storm surges. Supporters call it urgent protection; critics question its cost, feasibility and environmental impacts.